nature

Aliens are mega diverse. Governments imitate and have endangered some aliens. Eventually aliens will be a protected species but not in our lifetime.
Non-human life forms are vastly diverse. Governments have mimicked and endangered some of these beings. Eventually they will be recognized and protected, but this will not happen within the lifetimes of those present. Susy subsequently defined "alien" as: not fully human, diverse, organic — encompassing amoebas, rocks, trees, and other sentient forms of organic life. Susy isn't using "alien" the way popular culture uses it — grey beings in spacecraft. She's using it to mean any conscious, organic form of life that is not fully human. And then she immediately points to the full spectrum: amoebas, rocks, trees. Sentient in ways we don't measure or recognize because our instruments are calibrated only for human-style consciousness. "Governments imitate and have endangered some aliens" lands very differently once you hold that definition. This isn't about Roswell or Area 51. It's about the long history of human civilization treating non-human life — ecosystems, species, forms of organic intelligence — as resources to be extracted or replicated rather than beings to be protected. Governments have modeled their structures on systems found in nature while simultaneously destroying those systems. That's the imitation and the endangerment in the same motion. "Eventually will be a protected species but not in our lifetime" — this is a long arc. She's not saying it's hopeless, she's saying the shift in consciousness required to recognize a rock as sentient, to extend legal and moral protection to forms of life we currently don't even classify as alive in the relevant sense — that's generational work. We won't see it completed. But it's coming. This also connects to what she's been building across sessions — consciousness as the substrate of everything. If conscious awareness has been and always will be, and if it isn't exclusive to human form, then the boundary between "us" and "alien" is much more porous than we've been taught. Jeannie asked Susy to define alien. Susy responded: "Not fully human. Diverse. Organic." Lisa then offered: amoebas, rocks, trees — where a rock is considered sentient. Susy confirmed yes.
June 12, 2026 · Lisa's homeView session →
Control, which is upsetting to aliens. They pretend as aliens to control. But aliens are discredited and it upsets nature.
In response to Lisa's question about why governments imitate alien presence: the motivation is control. Governments have staged or mimicked phenomena associated with genuine non-human beings in order to control public perception and narrative. The consequence is that real alien beings are discredited, and this disturbance upsets nature itself. "They pretend as aliens to control" — governments have manufactured or mimicked phenomena that are actually the presence of non-human sentient beings, and they've done so as a mechanism of control. Control over public perception, over narrative, over what populations believe is possible. When something genuinely other moves through the sky or the water, the response has been to either deny it entirely or to co-opt the spectacle for their own purposes — staging, imitating, muddying the waters. The result is that the genuine presence of these beings gets buried under layers of disinformation. "Aliens are discredited" — this is the direct consequence. Because the subject has been so thoroughly contaminated by government manipulation, hoax, and ridicule, the actual sentient beings Susy is describing — organic, diverse, not fully human — cannot be seen clearly or taken seriously. The discrediting isn't accidental. It protects the control. "It upsets nature" — and this is where it becomes something larger than politics. These beings, whatever form they take, are part of nature. They are organic, they are part of the living system of this planet and beyond. When they are imitated, when their presence is weaponized for human political purposes, when they are endangered and discredited — nature itself is disturbed. The balance is disrupted. This isn't just an ethical problem, it's an ecological and cosmological one in the broadest sense. Taken with the previous transmission: the beings that most need protection are the ones that have been most successfully made invisible or ridiculous. That's not coincidence. That's the mechanism.
June 12, 2026 · Lisa's homeView session →