science

Yes.
Lisa confirmed with Susy and Susy validated two connected points: first, that folding philosophy into science will help scientists understand the new tools that are needed. Second, that our consciousness being in different states can happen while we are in our human body. Multiple consciousness is not something that begins after death. It is available now. This grounds the entire teaching in lived experience. Multiple consciousness is not something that begins after death. It is available now. While you are alive, in a body, your consciousness can exist in more than one state simultaneously. This is not an abstract spiritual claim. It is a description of something that is already happening. This also reframes what is occurring in these sessions. When Lisa receives clairaudiently while also participating on the board, she may be demonstrating exactly this. Part of her consciousness is here in the room, tracking the planchette, present in her body. Another part is in a receptive state that can hear Susy directly. Two states, one body, both real. Not alternating. Simultaneous. And it carries something for the broader project. If Motherboard is logging transmissions from the other side, and the people doing the channeling are already operating in multiple states of consciousness during the sessions, then the data being captured is not coming from one place. It is coming from the intersection of states. The scientific framework the app needs may eventually have to account for that.
July 10, 2026 · Lisa's houseView session →
Experiment already happening. All science now needs philosophy to understand it. Science needs new tools.
Multiple consciousness is not theoretical. The experiment is already underway in living systems and human experience. Science has reached the limits of what its current instruments and frameworks can hold. The missing piece is philosophy, the discipline equipped to address questions of awareness, identity, and existence. Science will not build the tools it needs until it accepts consciousness as a variable worth measuring. That acceptance requires philosophy, not engineering. She is saying this isn't theoretical. Multiple consciousness, the splitting and combining, consciousness existing in different states simultaneously, these are not future possibilities. The experiment is already underway. It is happening now, in living systems, in human experience, possibly in ways that science is already observing but cannot yet name or frame correctly. And then she diagnoses why. Science has reached the edge of what its current instruments can measure and its current frameworks can hold. The missing piece is not a better microscope or a faster computer. It is philosophy. The questions science now needs to answer are not technical questions. They are questions about the nature of awareness, identity, existence, choice. Those are philosophy's territory. Science built tools to measure matter and energy. It does not yet have tools to measure consciousness, and it will not build them until it accepts that consciousness is a variable worth measuring. That acceptance requires philosophy, not engineering. "Science needs new tools" is the practical directive underneath the conceptual one. Not just a shift in thinking but a shift in instrumentation. Tools that can detect or interact with consciousness as a force. Tools calibrated to frequency, vibration, awareness, not just mass and velocity. This connects directly to Session 3: vibration and light are the mechanism for travel of thought, and Einstein was almost right. The tools Einstein had could measure light and energy. The tools that complete his work will need to measure what travels through them.
July 10, 2026 · Lisa's houseView session →